Back to Resources
Psychological Impacts of Continuous Monitoring
CGM use involves psychological trade-offs between increased safety and reduced fear versus potential for data overload, anxiety, and diabetes distress.
Psychological Impacts of Continuous Monitoring
The Double-Edged Sword
CGM use is characterized by a trade-off between safety and surveillance.
Key Benefits
Reduced Fear of Hypoglycemia (FOH)
Predictive alarms provide reassurance, particularly for:
- Nighttime safety
- Driving confidence
- Exercise freedom
This significantly improves Quality of Life (QoL) for insulin-dependent users.
Empowerment
Real-time feedback loops help users understand:
- Direct impact of food choices
- Exercise effects on glucose
- Pattern recognition for better control
Key Risks
Diabetes Distress & Burnout
The relentless stream of data can lead to:
- Decision fatigue
- Moralization of glucose numbers (guilt/shame over spikes)
- Feeling that diabetes is "always on"
Alarm Fatigue
Frequent interruptions, especially false alarms, cause:
- Desensitization to alerts
- Sleep disruption
- Reduced quality of life
Remote Monitoring Tension
"Share" features can erode autonomy:
- Friction between patients and caregivers
- "Data policing" by family members
- Loss of privacy and independence
OTC/Wellness Anxiety
In non-diabetics, CGMs may fuel:
- Orthorexia: Obsessive "healthy" eating
- Anxiety over normal physiological spikes
- Pathologizing healthy metabolic function
Healthy CGM Use
Strategies for Balance
- Set reasonable time-in-range goals (not perfection)
- Customize alert thresholds to reduce fatigue
- Take intentional breaks from data viewing
- Focus on trends, not individual readings
- Seek support for diabetes distress