Home/Advanced Topics/Predictive Algorithms vs. Sensor Noise
Back to Advanced Topics

Predictive Algorithms vs. Sensor Noise

CGM algorithms must balance accurate glucose prediction against sensor noise and artifacts that can lead to false readings.

Predictive Algorithms vs. Sensor Noise

The Challenge

Predictive algorithms power CGMs, but sensor noise constantly threatens accuracy.

How Algorithms Handle Noise

Machine Learning Approaches

  • Pattern recognition to identify noise vs. signal
  • Historical data comparison
  • Multi-point trend analysis

Signal Filtering

  • Moving averages to smooth readings
  • Outlier detection and rejection
  • Weighted recent data preference

Sources of Sensor Noise

Biological

  • Foreign body response
  • Local tissue changes
  • Hydration fluctuations

Mechanical

  • Sensor movement
  • Compression events
  • Adhesive issues

Electrical

  • Electromagnetic interference
  • Temperature variations
  • Power fluctuations

Algorithm Trade-offs

Aggressive Smoothing

  • Pros: Cleaner, more stable readings
  • Cons: Increased lag time, delayed trend detection

Minimal Filtering

  • Pros: Faster response, real-time data
  • Cons: Noisier readings, more false alerts

Innovation in Noise Handling

Manufacturers continue to improve:

  • More sophisticated ML models
  • Better sensor chemistry (reduced biological noise)
  • Improved signal processing hardware
  • Adaptive algorithms that learn user patterns