Back to Advanced Topics
Predictive Algorithms vs. Sensor Noise
CGM algorithms must balance accurate glucose prediction against sensor noise and artifacts that can lead to false readings.
Predictive Algorithms vs. Sensor Noise
The Challenge
Predictive algorithms power CGMs, but sensor noise constantly threatens accuracy.
How Algorithms Handle Noise
Machine Learning Approaches
- Pattern recognition to identify noise vs. signal
- Historical data comparison
- Multi-point trend analysis
Signal Filtering
- Moving averages to smooth readings
- Outlier detection and rejection
- Weighted recent data preference
Sources of Sensor Noise
Biological
- Foreign body response
- Local tissue changes
- Hydration fluctuations
Mechanical
- Sensor movement
- Compression events
- Adhesive issues
Electrical
- Electromagnetic interference
- Temperature variations
- Power fluctuations
Algorithm Trade-offs
Aggressive Smoothing
- Pros: Cleaner, more stable readings
- Cons: Increased lag time, delayed trend detection
Minimal Filtering
- Pros: Faster response, real-time data
- Cons: Noisier readings, more false alerts
Innovation in Noise Handling
Manufacturers continue to improve:
- More sophisticated ML models
- Better sensor chemistry (reduced biological noise)
- Improved signal processing hardware
- Adaptive algorithms that learn user patterns